Fitna
Labels: Terror
Labels: Terror
When I was still a member of what is probably best termed the British
Jihadi Network - a series of British Muslim terrorist groups linked by a single ideology - I remember how we used to laugh in celebration whenever people on TV proclaimed that the sole cause for Islamic acts of terror like 9/11, the Madrid bombings and 7/7 was Western foreign policy.
By blaming the Government for our actions, those who pushed this "Blair's bombs" line did our propaganda work for us.
More important, they also helped to draw away any critical examination from the real engine of our violence: Islamic theology.Those are the words of former Islamic fanatic, Hassan Butt, writing in the Daily Mail. He left the Jihadi movement in February of 2006 when he "realised that its members had simply become mindless killers." Is there really any need for me to comment on this? I'll just let him continue...
But if I were still fighting for their cause, I'd be laughing once again.
Mohammed Sidique Khan met with the author on two separate occasions Mohammad Sidique Khan, the leader of the July 7 bombings, and I were both part of the network - I met him on two occasions.And though many British extremists are angered by the deaths of fellow Muslim across the world, what drove me and many others to plot acts of extreme terror within Britain and abroad was a sense that we were fighting for the creation of a revolutionary worldwide Islamic state that would dispense Islamic justice.
Think about that. How many times have we been over this. Their goal is not to live in peace. Their goal is to convert you or kill you. And they feel completely justified in doing it. He continues...
The foundation of extremist reasoning rests upon a model of the world in which you are either a believer or an infidel.
Formal Islamic theology, unlike Christian theology, does not allow for the separation of state and religion: they are considered to be one and the same.
For centuries, the reasoning of Islamic jurists has set down rules of interaction between Dar ul-Islam (the Land of Islam) and Dar ul-Kufr (the Land of Unbelief) to cover almost every matter of trade, peace and war.
But what radicals and extremists do is to take this two steps further. Their first step has been to argue that, since there is no pure Islamic state, the whole world must be Dar ul-Kufr (The Land of Unbelief).
Ah, so we are all non-believers. Now pay close attention to this because this is important...
Step two: since Islam must declare war on unbelief, they have declared war upon the whole world.
Along with many of my former peers, I was taught by Pakistani and British radical preachers that this reclassification of the globe as a Land of War (Dar ul-Harb) allows any Muslim to destroy the sanctity of the five rights that every human is granted under Islam: life, wealth, land, mind and belief.
In Dar ul-Harb, anything goes, including the treachery and cowardice of attacking civilians.
But we have to afford them the protections of the Geneva Convention? Let me tell you something. You cannot fight these people with sensitivity. You will never stop these maniacs by trying to be civilized. You can give me this "we'll be no better than them" bullshit all you want, it isn't going to change the reality that these people are willing to glorify murdering innocent people in pursuit of their stated goal. And honestly, that's what separates us from them. Our motives, our goals, and our state of mind. We don't purposely target civilians. We aren't willing to cut the heads off of non-Christians. We actually desire peace. They desire death. That is what separates us. Not our tactics, but our intent.
No war has ever been won by doing just enough to win. You win wars by completely overwhelming your enemy. You win wars by making your enemy so miserable and so desperate to survive, they will surrender. You have to make them so miserable, that they actually change their mindset from that of willing to die to that of just seeking peace, to that of just wishing it was over. That's how you defeat them.
Those on the left that want to blame American foreign policy and George Bush had better wake up and smell reality. They hated us before we invaded Iraq. They wanted to kill us before George W. Bush was elected. They wanted to dominate the world long before any of this current mess started. And they aren't going to just stop coming after us if we leave Iraq. They do hate us for our freedoms. They do hate us for our way of life. Their stated goal is an Islamic world. And by definition, an Islamic world goes against every notion of freedom and our way of life. I can't imagine any better day than July 4th to think about that.
Happy Independence Day...
You can discuss this article in the Nightmare Forums
"The clash we're witnessing around the world is not a clash of religions" but a clash of "a mentality that belongs to the middle ages and a mentality that belongs to the 21st century." And "a clash between the civilized and the primitive."You think about the idea of sending your kid to a school that constantly teaches hate and violence against infedels. They idolize their suicide bombers that kill innocent people by blowing themselves up in a crowded cafe. Does that sound civilized in any way?
"We have not seen a single Jew blow himself up in a German restaurant. We have not seen a single Jew destroy a church. We have not seen a single Jew protest by killing people. The Muslims have turned three Buddha statues into rubble. We have not seen a single Buddist burn down a mosque, kill a Muslim, or burn down an embassy. Only Muslims defend their beliefs by burnding down churches, killing people, and burning down embassies."Give it a look and read what she says. I would turn down the volume because it's not in English and it gets kind of annoying after a while.
Labels: Terror
Courtesy of Jihad Watch May 12, 2007Islamberg is not as benign as a Buddhist monastery or a Carmelite convent. Nearly every weekend, neighbors hear sounds of gunfire. Some, including a combat veteran of the Vietnam War, have heard the bang of small explosives. None of the neighbors wished to be identified for fear of "retaliation." "We don't even dare to slow down when we drive by," one resident said. "They own the mountain and they know it and there is nothing we can do about it but move, and we can't even do that. Who wants to buy a property near that?"
The complex serves to scare the bejeesus out of the local residents. "If you go there, you better wear body armor," a customer at the Circle E Diner in Hancock said. "They have armed guards and if they shoot you, nobody will find your body."
At Cousins, a watering hole in nearby Deposit, a barfly, who didn't wish to be identified, said: "The place is dangerous. You can hear gunfire up there. I can't understand why the FBI won't shut it down."
Islamberg is a branch of Muslims of the Americas Inc., a tax-exempt organization formed in 1980 by Pakistani cleric Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani, who refers to himself as "the sixth Sultan Ul Faqr," Gilani, has been directly linked by court documents to Jamaat ul-Fuqra or "community of the impoverished," an organization that seeks to "purify" Islam through violence.
Though primarily based in Lahore, Pakistan, Jamaat ul-Fuqra has operational headquarters in New York and openly recruits through various social service organizations in the U.S., including the prison system. Members live in hamaats or compounds, such as Islamberg, where they agree to abide by the laws of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, which are considered to be above local, state and federal authority. Additional hamaats have been established in Hyattsville, Maryland; Red House, Virginia; Falls Church, Virginia; Macon, Georgia; York, South Carolina; Dover, Tennessee; Buena Vista, Colorado; Talihina, Oklahoma; Tulane Country, California; Commerce, California; and Onalaska, Washington. Others are being built, including an expansive facility in Sherman, Pennsylvania.
Labels: Terror

On the show she co-hosts, The View, where Rosie once told her viewers that "radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America," she decided to take the stance that we shouldn't live in fear by telling co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck not to fear the terrorists.
"Faith or fear, that's your choice. You can walk through life believing in the goodness of the world, or walk through life afraid of anyone who thinks different than you and trying to convert them to your way of thinking."
So, we shouldn't live in fear, but Rosie can? She must have been living in fear when she hired an armed body guard to take her kid to school. Hiring an armed body guard sure sounds like the act of a person that is very afraid.
The idiocy of this woman never ceases to amaze me. What amazes me most is she, being a lesbian, should be more afraid of the terrorists than anyone else. I wonder if she's aware that in Muslim countries such as Iran, Sudan, Somalia, and pre-war Afghanistan, homosexuality is punishable by death...
The obsurdity of a homosexual woman defending terrorists as "mothers and fathers" could only come from a leftist. That's because, as I've told you before, Liberalism is the act of standing on your head and telling the rest of the world they are upside down.
Look, do I live in fear? No. Absolutely not. Do I worry about terrorist attacks on our country? Yes I do. I recognize that there are people in this world that want us dead. They want us all dead and for no other reason than we don't believe in what they believe. Perhaps it's because I realize the chances of me coming face to face with a terrorist or being killed in a terrorist attack are slim to none. But that doesn't take away my concern for other Americans. And it would appear to me, by defending terrorists as "mothers and fathers" Rosie O'Donnell neither recognizes the threat to some Americans, or she just doesn't care about some Americans.
My hunch is, it's both.
Labels: Terror